Eklipse Premium starts at $24.99/month on web, or about $14.99/month on the annual plan, and Pro Edits costs $18.99 per edit on top. If you only want a quick answer, that’s the starting point for eklipse pricing, not the prettier headline number.
For a streamer counting every subscription line item, that matters. The free tier is tight, the paid tier is built for heavier clip volume, and the add-on editing layer can turn a moderate bill into a serious monthly commitment fast.
Table of Contents
- What Eklipse Actually Costs in 2026
- Free Tier Versus Premium Feature Breakdown
- How Billing Cycles Affect the Effective Price
- The Pro Edits Add-On Most Pricing Pages Skip
- Who Each Eklipse Tier Is Built For
- Eklipse Versus StreamGen on Price and Value
- A Real Scenario When the Free Tier Stops Being Enough
- Common Eklipse Pricing Questions Answered
What Eklipse Actually Costs in 2026
Eklipse pricing is simple on the surface and layered underneath. Premium starts at $24.99/month on web, the annual plan works out to about $14.99/month, and every Pro Edit is $18.99 on top of the subscription, so your real monthly spend depends on how often you need polished output rather than basic clipping.
That’s the first thing budget-conscious streamers should understand. A lot of pricing pages stop at the base subscription, but the base plan only covers part of the workflow. If you need frequent human-assisted edits, the bill stops looking like a neat monthly flat rate and starts looking like a usage-based media cost.
Practical rule: if your stream output is occasional and you only need automated highlights, compare the subscription only. If you need branded clips or client-ready edits, price the subscription plus the add-on layer before you commit.
For a fast comparison of plan structures, see pricing options and then check what the tool gives you for the money. If you’re comparing alternatives, this Eklipse pricing alternative breakdown is useful because it focuses on where the costs sit instead of just repeating the headline rate.
The smartest way to approach eklipse pricing is to treat it like two separate decisions. First, decide whether the free tier covers your current clipping volume. Second, decide whether your workflow needs the paid capacity and add-on editing, because those are the costs that usually surprise people after signup.
Free Tier Versus Premium Feature Breakdown
The free tier is a capped plan for light clipping, not a trial dressed up as one. It gives you 720p exports, 15 clips per stream, 3 hours per stream, 1 stream per day, and 14-day storage. Premium raises the ceiling to 1080p, 100 clips per stream, up to 12-hour streams, 3 streams per day, and 90-day storage (features page; pricing help).
What those limits mean in practice
A short session with a few highlight moments fits the free tier fine. 15 clips per 3-hour stream works for a casual recap, but it falls short fast if you want to pull more than the obvious moments from a full broadcast and repurpose them across platforms. The 720p export cap is acceptable for some short-form posts, but it does not give you the cleanest result if you care about a sharper finish on every clip.
Premium is a processing budget upgrade. The jump to 100 clips per stream and 12-hour sessions gives you room for long VODs, overnight broadcasts, and creators who do not want to babysit the tool every time they go live. That is why the paid tier is about more than watermark removal. It decides whether the tool can keep pace with your actual content volume.
For creators who test workflow tools against real output, the line between “enough for a few clips” and “enough for a full session” is where the decision gets practical. Once your stream style pushes past those limits, the free plan stops being a saver and starts becoming a bottleneck.
Bottom line: free is for light, occasional clipping. Premium is for creators who need broader capture, more exports, and longer retention without constantly hitting the wall.
How Billing Cycles Affect the Effective Price
Eklipse gives you three web billing choices, and the upfront number matters more than the plan label. The monthly option is $24.99, the 6-month option is $112.99, and the annual plan is $179.99.
| Billing cycle | Upfront cost | Effective per month |
|---|---|---|
| Monthly | $24.99 | $24.99 |
| 6 months | $112.99 | about $18.83 |
| Annual | $179.99 | about $14.99 |
The math is simple. Divide the total by the months covered, and you get the monthly cost. That is the number that matters when you compare tools, because the sticker price only tells you what you pay today, not what the subscription costs over time.
The annual plan gives you the lowest per-month rate, but it only makes sense if you already know you will keep using Eklipse. If you are still testing your workflow, the monthly plan is expensive but safer. If clipping is already part of your regular routine, annual billing is the smarter buy because it cuts the ongoing cost in a way you can feel.
Billing channel can change the checkout price, too. Web and app-store pricing do not always match, so do not assume every purchase path is equal. Pick the channel that fits your commitment level, because the cheapest option is the one that matches how long you plan to stay subscribed.
A streamer posting highlights every week should compare billing against output, not against the headline price alone. If you only need a short trial period, pay month to month and keep your risk low. If you already know Eklipse will stay in your workflow, the longer billing cycle is the one that protects your budget. For a broader look at how billing and editing costs stack up across tools, see this vertical video editor comparison.
Decision rule: choose monthly if you are testing the workflow, 6-month if you are already posting consistently, and annual only if clipping is now part of your routine.
The Pro Edits Add-On Most Pricing Pages Skip
Pro Edits is the part of eklipse pricing that changes the budget picture. Eklipse’s help center says Pro Edits is separate from the standard plan and is sold at $18.99 per edit or in packs, so anyone who wants more polished output has to treat that as a separate line item, not a feature baked into the base subscription. (Pro Edits help)
Who needs it
Agencies need it when a client wants brand-safe clips with a cleaner finish. Sponsored creators need it when the deliverable has to look ready for publication without extra manual work. Streamers who do not edit their own clips may want it too, but that is where the price climbs fast.
For a solo streamer posting one or two highlights a week, Pro Edits is usually too much. You are paying for a finishing layer that only makes sense if the clip has real commercial value or you are too busy to touch the edit yourself. If you are just getting a few moments onto social, the base plan is the part that matters.
The warning sign is frequency. Two Pro Edits per week at $18.99 each adds roughly $151.92 per month on top of Premium, which means the add-on can swallow the budget before you even factor in storage or higher resolution. That is why this fee deserves attention instead of getting buried under feature lists.
For creators comparing editorial workflows, another tool can look cleaner on paper. A browser-based option like StreamGen’s AI VOD editor bundles the clip workflow differently, so you need to decide whether you want a separate paid edit layer or a more unified setup.
Who Each Eklipse Tier Is Built For
The free tier is fine for casual creators who aren’t pushing volume. If you stream a couple of short sessions a week and post a few highlights to one platform, 15 clips per stream and 720p output probably cover your needs without forcing an upgrade. That’s the clean use case for staying free.
Where the free plan starts to strain
Mid-volume streamers hit friction faster. Once your sessions stretch toward the longer side and you’re posting across multiple platforms, the 3-hour cap and clip limit start working against you instead of for you. Storage also matters more at that point, because a short retention window forces you to move faster than you may want to.
Premium is built for heavy use, not vanity upgrades. The 12-hour stream cap, 100-clip allowance, and longer storage window make sense for creators who repurpose a lot of content, esports teams running repeated output, and agencies that need a larger buffer to manage multiple channels. The paid tier gives you operational breathing room.
If you regularly stream longer than three hours or post more than fifteen clips per session, the free tier will feel restrictive inside a week.
That’s the cleanest self-check. If your current workflow already brushes up against those caps, don’t pretend the free plan is a long-term answer. It isn’t.
Eklipse Versus StreamGen on Price and Value
Eklipse and StreamGen solve different pricing problems. Eklipse Premium starts at $24.99/month on web, or about $14.99/month on the annual plan, and it can add Pro Edits on top. StreamGen starts at €5.49/month and combines AI clipping, a browser clip editor, and direct posting to TikTok, YouTube Shorts, and Instagram Reels in one workspace. If you want a separate comparison point for editing workflow, this vertical video editor guide is the right place to look.
Where the money goes
Eklipse charges for capacity. Its pricing is built around how much content you process, how long your streams run, and whether you want to pay for a separate human-edit layer. StreamGen charges for workflow consolidation, because it keeps clipping, editing, scheduling, and posting under one roof.
That difference changes the bill in a real way. With Eklipse, you are paying first for clip volume and retention, then paying again if you want Pro Edits. With StreamGen, you are paying for a single publishing path, so you spend less time exporting, downloading, and moving between tools.
Which value story fits you
If your main problem is hitting clip limits, Eklipse is the cleaner fit. If your main problem is getting clips out without extra tool juggling, StreamGen is easier to defend on price. Those are different buying jobs, so the lower sticker price is not automatically the better deal.
I would judge this with three questions. Do you need more clip capacity, do you need a stronger editor, and do you want built-in posting? Your answers point to the pricing model that makes sense, and they keep you from paying for capacity you will not use.
A Real Scenario When the Free Tier Stops Being Enough
A streamer runs two 4-hour Twitch sessions per week and pulls 20 to 25 clips per stream for TikTok, YouTube Shorts, and Instagram Reels. The free tier runs out fast. It caps output at 15 clips per stream and limits streams to 3 hours, so this creator is over both limits before the week is even over.
What happens first
The first step is usually a Premium upgrade at $24.99/month on web. That clears the clip cap and gives more room for longer sessions, but it does not remove the extra cost of polished output if the streamer wants sponsor-ready cuts. Pro Edits still costs $18.99 per edit, and that is where the bill starts climbing quickly.
If that creator requests two Pro Edits per week, the add-on alone becomes roughly $151.92 per month. At that point, the decision is no longer about getting more clips. It is about whether the editorial layer is worth paying for every week, month after month.
Why another workflow can look cheaper
A creator with the same volume can also look at a tool like StreamGen because it bundles clipping, editing, and posting in one workflow with paid plans starting at €5.49/month. That does not make it the right choice for every streamer, but it does make the pricing easier to predict when you want one stack instead of a base plan plus a separate edit meter.
The takeaway is blunt. Usage forces the upgrade, but the editor and posting layer decide which tool stays cheaper at scale.
Common Eklipse Pricing Questions Answered
Yes, the public price changed. An earlier official announcement listed Premium at $19.99/month and $149.99/year, while the current help page shows $24.99/month and $179.99/year. That leaves the newer plan at a higher entry point than the older announcement, so anyone comparing screenshots or old posts should check the current help page before budgeting (pricing history; current pricing help).
Choose monthly billing if you are still testing the workflow or you expect your posting volume to change. Choose annual billing only if you already know you will keep clipping for the full year, because that is the cleaner way to lower the effective monthly cost. For casual streamers, the flexibility of monthly billing usually matters more than the sticker savings.
The free tier is enough for a brand-new streamer who is still learning how often they publish clips. It gives you a real workflow to test, not a stripped-down demo. Once you start posting on a regular schedule, though, the limits will feel tight fast.
Pro Edits changes the bill more than the headline subscription does. The base plan gets you into the system, but every extra edit adds another charge, so the monthly total depends on how much finishing work you expect Eklipse to do for you. That is the number to watch, because a cheap starting price can turn into an expensive editing stack once you rely on the add-on.
If you want a lower-friction way to turn live streams into shorts without piling a separate edit bill on top, take a look at StreamGen. It combines AI clipping, a browser editor, and direct posting in one place, which makes it easier to compare against Eklipse when you care about the monthly total, not just the starting price.
More blog posts
